The United States and South Korean view on North Korea Essay Example for Free

The United States and South Korean view on North Korea Essay Abstract: Since the declaration of North Korea’s nuclear experiments, many countries have reacted negatively towards the subject. Most concerns have come from the United States and South Korea, as the two countries have close ideologies on North Korea’s policies. Relatively, the North Korea’s history had its focus on military power, politically. The strategic location of the country around the Sea Japan 50 nm on maritime force and the mountainous terrains between Russia, China and South Korea, makes the area isolated from the influences it could get on the political aspect. Its current leader, Kim Jong IL, has permanently believed on the Juche and Independence. Hence, its subsequent actions towards other countries have been very open in accordance to its motivations. Tying up with the concrete documents and studies on North Korea’s geopolitical position, the observation of United States and South Korea remains concurrent and comprehensive. Historical Background:   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Before, North Korea has existing ties with the Soviet Union, giving the country a chance to exploit the relationship of United States and the Soviet Union. However, the wind suddenly blew away from the North Korea’s political objectives, as Soviet Union diminished its relationship with North Korea in the 1980’s. It leaves the country of no military alliance to a powerful country and becomes isolated for a very long period (wiki.galbijim.com, 1993). Because of the subsequent negative events on North Korea, the decision to make talks with South Korea became inevitable in 1984 leaving the South Korea-U.S. team military exercise cancelled in June 1992. Following this action was the Declaration of Denuclearization on the Korean Peninsula on December 31, 1991, which bans the testing, manufacture, production, possession, storage, deployment, receipt, and use of nuclear weapons on the peninsula (wiki.galbjim.com, 1993).   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Its resistance to be absorbed by the South Korea’s growing economic success has mediated the motivation of North Korea to make efforts of military advancements, which serves nuclear power as a choice of military force. As the news of nuclear testing in North Korea spread, United States declared a deadline for the country’s submissive alliance to their policies (english.ohmynews.com, 2006). North Korea’s nuclear test in October 9, 2006 has been the desperate option of North Korea to avert a threat in regime collapse and the reunification to South Korea (Jae Hoon, 2006). Objectives: To observe differences between the South Korea’s and United States opinion on North Korea nuclear tests. To describe how the sea power and air force of North Korea has developed after its separation from the Soviet Union. To determine the reasons for its obvious resistance from South Korea’s growing opportunities of political power. To analyze the future methods planned by the United States government against North Korea’s political strategies. To distinguish which countries have the volition over North Korea’s desperate actions concerning military and political methods. Technical Approach:   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   This research will examine different sources coming from North Korea’s web archive, the United States’ CIA World Fact book, and articles containing the geopolitical stance of North Korea. Furthermore, it will reexamine the geography and its influence to North Korea’s capability upon its engagement on warfare. Tables, maps and appendices will also be provided when necessary. Bibliography: â€Å"Analysis: Bush Knows that Iran is not North Korea.† 2 November 2007. 30 January 2008. http://www.iran-resist.org/article3948 Avery, E. Squassoni, S. â€Å"North Korea’s Nuclear Test: Motivations, Implications, and U.S. Options.† 24 October 2006. 30 January 2008. http://fas.org/sgp/crs/nuke/RL33709.pdf. Bulychev, G. â€Å"The Geopolitics of the North Korea-South Korea Rail Link to China, Russia and Europe.† 30 May 2006. 30 January 2008. http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?ItemID=10350. Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. â€Å"Politics.† 30 January 2008. http://www.korea-dpr.com/. Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. â€Å"Geography.† 30 January 2008. http://www.korea-dpr.com/. â€Å"Geopolitical Changes: New World Order and North Korean Security.† June 1993. 30 January 2008. http://wiki.galbijim.com/Loc2:Geopolitical_Changes:_New_World_Order_and_North_Korean_Securitys of June 1993. Harding, A. â€Å"South Korea’s Anger Over Nuclear Test.† 14 October 2006. 30 January 2008. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/6048344.stm. Jae Hoon, S. â€Å"North Korea’s Nuclear Gamble.† 10 October 2006. 30 January 2008. http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/display.article?id=8274. Jones, N. â€Å"North Korea’s Nuclear Test and Pacific Geopolitics.† 15 December 2006. 30 January 2008. http://www.globalengage.org/media/article.aspx?id=2032 Kalinowski, J. CIA World Fact book-North Korea. 29 October 2000. 30 January 2008. http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1378861. Kim Beng, P. â€Å"A Shift in the Regional Balance of Power After North Koreas Nuclear Test?† 2006. 30 January 2008. http://www.aseanfocus.com/asiananalysis/article.cfm?articleID=995. Klinger, B. â€Å"North Korea: Clouds Block the Sunshine at the Six-Party Talks.† 10 January 2008. 30 January 2008. http://www.heritage.org/Research/AsiaandthePacific/wm1771.cfm. Nicksch, L. â€Å"North Korea’s Nuclear Weapon’s Program.† 5 April 2002. 30 January 2008. Olsen, E. â€Å"U.S.-North Korea: From Brinkmanship to Dialogue.† 1 April 2003. 30 January 2008. http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/rsepResources/si/apr03/eastAsia.asp. Pei, M. Mastro, O. â€Å"How to Deal with North Korea.† 31 December 2006. 30 January 2008. http://www.carnegieendowment.org/publications/index.cfm?fa=viewid=18918prog=zch,zgpproj=znpp. Staff Writers. â€Å"North Korea Vows To Bolster Military Power.† 25 March 2007. 30 January 2007. http://www.spacewar.com/reports/North_Korea_Vows_To_Bolster_Military_Power_999.html. Suk, H.H. â€Å"N Korea Military Tactics In A War With US: A Strategy Of Massive Retaliations Against US Attacks.†Ã‚   24 March 2008 http://www.rense.com/general37/nkorr.htm. Tanweer, A. â€Å"North Korea, South Korea: U.S. Policy at the time of Crisis.† Journal of Third World Studies. Spring 2005. 30 January 2008. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3821/is_200504/ai_n13642816. Tanaka, A. â€Å"Overview of Geopolitical Risks in Northeast Asia.† 30 January 2008. http://www.sais-jhu.edu/centers/reischauer/MOFTanaka.pdf. Thor. â€Å"Korea, North and South: The Geopolitics of Unification.† 30 January 2001. 30 January 2008. http://thormay.net/koreadiary/northsouth1.html.

A Passage from Hamlet :: essays papers

A Passage from Hamlet Hamlet is probably the best known and most popular play of William Shakespeare, and it is natural for any person to question what makes Hamlet a great tragedy and why it receives such praises. The answer is in fact simple; it effectively arouses pity and fear in the audiences’ mind. The audience feels pity when they see a noble character experiencing a regrettable downfall because of his innate tragic flaw, and they fear that the same thing might happen to them. Hamlet’s speech (III, iv, 139-180) contributes to producing this feeling of pity and fear. First it explains the thought with particular emotional effectiveness. Second it conveys Hamlet’s character, both virtue and tragic fear. Lastly, it marks the beginning of the tragic discovery and Hamlet’s downfall, answering the question â€Å"why does Hamlet delay?† Observing the beginning of Hamlet’s downfall and tragic discovery in this passage, which happens despite his many virtues, maximizes the pity and fear at the same time. The first contribution is that this passage conveys Hamlet’s thoughts with poetic and emotional effectiveness. Hamlet denies his madness and urges Gertrude not to make his madness an excuse for her faults. He asserts that excuses would only cover the superficial faults and the soul would be corrupted deep within. He further asks Gertrude not to commit any more sins that make past faults even worse and to confess herself to heaven. After all, Hamlet sarcastically begs her pardon for his reproach. Hamlet explains that during the extremely rotten time, Hamlet, who is good and of virtue, must beg pardon to and get permission from Gertrude, who represents vice by committing many sins, to do good things such as urging her to repent. As a method for salvation, Hamlet asks her not to go to Claudius’ bed. Then he apologizes for the death of Polonius and admits his own fault. However, he insists that Polonius and he both are punished because God has made him the agent to punish Polonius with him and him with Polonius. He takes the responsibility, and explains Gertrude that he is cruel only to be kind to her and warns that worse things are yet to come. Through out the passage, imageries are used to add poetic emotion to Hamlet’s thought. One example is â€Å"unction† in Hamlet’s speech â€Å"Lay not that flattering unction to your soul†¦It will but skin and film the ulcerous place whiles rank corruption, mining all within, infects unseen.

Different Views on Ethical Perspectives Essay

We, as human beings are more often aware of our actions. Before we make decisions critical analysis comes with a great consideration. We are able to analyze these things because are considered as rational beings and we have the ability to think to the highest level we can. We opt to consider whether these things are good or not, if it’s right or wrong and if it’s really needed or not; this we often consider as ethics. Ethics is an issue of morality. There are things that we do that others consider wrong, but others may consider righteous. According to the society we should act as what it considers right; norms are one of the foundations of ethics and we should act accordingly. Norms can be a basis of what is morally right or wrong. There are four perspectives to be discussed in this paper, each of them having their own characteristics and each of them having their strong points and their weaknesses. The perspectives are universally known as the character or virtue, deontology or the perspective of obligation, the theory of utilitarianism and the equity or principle of relativism. The theory of utilitarianism points out two things; one thing is better than the other if we could gain more pleasure from it, and the other thing is not that good, or better yet to say evil, if we could only gain pain from it. This theory also states that we do things voluntarily, that one is considered as the pilot of his own decisions and that such consequences could have not taken place if only he did or did not do such actions. The amount or quantity of pleasure or pain takes into a great consideration in the concept of utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is better understood as having the maximization quantity of benefit and less quantity of bad or the pain it can cause. A person would have two distinct choices, the first one is that if he does the action he would gain more pleasure or shall I say he can maximize the benefits of the action; the other is that if he does the action he would have to gain more risks and consequences. The first choice would be most favored because we, as human beings would not want to suffer from the choices we make, we do not want to be suffering from the consequences of our actions so what we do is do the thing that would give us the most favorable and maximum quantity of pleasure (Moore, 1912). Virtue is an ethical perspective that tackles about the actions that we make and the ideals we have in life that we should strive for and that these ideals help us in developing our highest potentials as human beings. This focuses on the traits or character that one has, the dispositions in life and the attitudes whether be it bad or good. Virtues are acquired through doing it everyday, they become a person’s characteristic when they are practiced for the longer time. There are a lot of characteristics and virtues a person can have; truthfulness, patience, honesty, and courteous are some of these. Virtue would help us in pursuing the ideals that we have in life (C. A. Manuel Velasquez, Thomas Shanks, S. J. , and Michael J. Meyer 1996). The theory of ethical relativism states that morality is based on the culture of a society. It singles out that one can either be wrong or right, bad or evil depending on the society the person belongs to; the society is the one concerned in creating its own culture. This theory is basically called relativism because being good or bad is relative of the kind of society a person belongs to; the society dictates whatever thing is perceived as good or bad. Every single society shares a common culture, this culture defines good and bad and the people should act with accordance to the standards of the society they belong. This theory is often argued because of the fact that every single society has its own culture and therefore has its own perception of bad or good. However, this theory is useful in exploring the reasons behind the differentiation of culture among societies (C. A. Manuel Velasquez, Thomas Shanks, S. J. , and Michael J. Meyer, 1992). Obligation perspective holds the golden rule â€Å"do not do unto others what you don’t want others do unto you†. It simply states that we should do what is only right and not what is wrong. It holds the principle of doing what is good because of the obligation. Say for example, a person should tell the truth because that person is bound to have an obligation to tell the truth because he doesn’t want other people not to trust him and because he upholds the value of truthfulness. This perspective is sometimes being pertained to utilitarianism, but it is totally different. While obligation is obligatory, utilitarianism is a voluntary act. After taking the ethical awareness test, I have known that what ethic perspective dominates in me is the obligation or the deontology. My perspective is based on my obligation or duty to do what is morally right. With this, I am to consider a thing as ethical if I choose how I act and what rules I am willing to oblige. It is also stated in my ethical perspective that the people should not be treated as a means to justify an end, simply stating â€Å"the end does not justify the means†. I also believe that every single individual should be given the respect that any man should have and therefore I won’t be able to comply with the policies and social traditions aimed at the best interest of the society as a whole. However, my approach to ethics requires legal and humane limits, I simply believe that people should be allowed to make their own choices and I advocate policies that have the intention to ensure equal opportunities for all as well as equal respect. My ethical perspective upholds the principle of doing things in accordance with the standards of right and wrong. However, though my ethical perspective aims to do what is morally right I am faced with numbers of dilemmas with regards to work. These problems would somehow cause me frustrations and may lead to a more devastated life in the future for it is not only concerned in the present but it also pertains to the future. One of the problems I am going to face with this perspective is that the people I work with might argue that some people within a society are not able to act in their own best interests. I may find this a fallacy because it was once used in the denying of the equitable treatment to women and the minorities. This somehow would result to frustration. The second problem I am to face with this perspective is that what I perceived to be morally right may not benefit most of the people. It doesn’t necessarily mean that if I have perceived a thing to be morally right it would maximize the good or pleasure. This would cause me another frustration because if I had made a decision which I perceived to be right and it didn’t work to be beneficial I may have doubts when I make a decision again. It might cause greater problems in the future. Another dilemma I am to face with this perspective is that defending this may end up in economic hardship; in worst cases I can be terminated. Say for example, in a working place several employees should be terminated because the company is having low production because these people are handicapped or they are simply not productive, the best action would be to terminate them but I, as a moralist would say that they should not be terminated because they have children. In the long run, if these people would be in the company and the company has still a low productivity the company would have losses and it may lead to closure because of the losses. Having things perceived as morally right may not be totally right; some may be beneficial but some can create more problems. We as human beings should act accordingly to whatever it is that we perceive because these choices are free of charge, because God created us with the opportunity of having what we call free will and should be practiced. We should not depend on what others may in making our decisions but we should also be ready for the consequences that accompany our decisions. Whatever action we do we should think of it twice, we should think that there are always two sides of a story. We should not be bounded by obligations because this might cause us greater frustrations in the future and this may lead to a very low self-esteem. We don’t want these to happen that’s why we should think critically and make decisions wisely because we are the pilot of our own lives.

Chaos And Confusion Of The Asb Speech - 1486 Words

Chaos to Unity â€Å"Is everyone here? Can we finally start? We’re two minutes late!† â€Å"Miss President, calm down! The ASB advisor isn’t even here.† The ultimate chaos and confusion of the ASB could be seen by observing the first weekly meeting that took place on a Friday afternoon after a tiring day of arduous classes. The medium-sized, stuffy room in which meetings were held did not aid in enlivening the snoozing council and the burned-out cabinet. Usually, everyone arrived late, the tardiest being the ASB advisor, who was incessantly typing things that even he couldn’t make sense of. Two sisters, Briann and Mickey Shue, also arrived late and threw themselves on the ‘70s style couch in the back of the room, where Briann dozed off. Daniel, â€Å"the†¦show more content†¦As secretary, I was given the task to troubleshoot the lack of participation and share the results with the rest of the cabinet; after analyzing the information, we decided to better promote our group by emailing students and distributing flyers to advertise our upcoming events. We also decided to conduct fundraisers more frequently in orde r to excite the rest of the high schoolers. Therefore, by applying these tactics, the ASB planned to resonate its purpose throughout the school and attract passionate high schoolers to contribute, despite foreseen numerous disagreements to be encountered along the way. We were so close to unification. It was a month since this meeting when our ASB President, Vice President, Activities Coordinator, and I huddled in front of the Eisenhower Nursing Home, gently rubbing our hands against each other as the biting cold sought to subdue it. We squinted as the raindrops trickled over our think coats, our eyes attentively seeking the arrival of any high schooler we had contacted. I sniffled my nose as I felt my already present virus doubling in triumph. â€Å"Kayla, I emailed at least ten people to come and join us,† I assured our president as she inquired who was to come. â€Å"But they must have forgotten or didn’t receive my email. It’s a pity Briann and Mickey should have a recital to go to. I’ve heard they have really great voices and couldShow MoreRelatedMetamorphoses Within Frankenstein14861 Words   |  60 PagesMariner , who erupts into Mary Sh elley’s text as o ccasionally and inev itably as th e Monster into Victor Frankenstein’s lif e, Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometh eus passes, like night, from land to land and w ith stang ely ad aptable powers of speech addresses itself to a critical aud ien ce that is larger and mor e diverse than that of almo st any oth er work of liter atur e in Eng lish : Mary Shelley’s Franken stein is famously reinterpretable. It can be a late v ersion of th e Faust myRead MoreExploring Corporate Strategy - Case164366 Words   |  658 Pagesdiscipline to the team. Whilst there had always been a huge supply of talent at Ferrari, particularly in the design and development of engines, it had not always reached its collective potential. Enzo’s autocratic style of ‘divide and rule’ had created confusion and rivalry within the team. Montezemolo deï ¬ ned strict areas of responsibility in order to reduce the amount of interference and internal politics. This created a situation where the various technical teams (chassis and suspension; engine; gearbox)